Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Republican Stupidity

Every four years, Americans wonder why there are no good, honest, steadfast candidates for President. They wonder why all the candidates shamelessly pander to the media, and proceed to blatantly misrepresent their records. Every year, they pledge that if a superior, resolute candidate ever runs for President, he will certainly have their vote.

Then when one comes along, they reject him. Fred Thompson is everything voters claim they want—reasonably honest, consistent, intelligent and unimpeachable ideologically.
In addition, he is far better than other Republican candidate. He has not experienced any of the convenient conversions of Mitt Romney. Neither does he support health care mandates and gun control laws, as the Massachusetts governor does. He lacks all of Rudy Giuliani’s many weaknesses, whether it be on guns, abortion, gay rights, or immigration. He is far better than McCain or Huckabee—their positions on immigration should be enough to keep them from the nomination. The only blot on Thompson’s conservative record is his unfortunate support of the disastrous McCain-Feingold Act. With that exception, his conservative credentials are perfect—and precisely what GOP voters claim they want.

But he is a poor campaigner, so voters reject him en masse.

Is shaking hands in Iowa restaurants still that crucial? In the days before 24/7 media coverage, that sort of thing gave voters a chance to see the candidate. But in the day of 24-hour news, C-SPAN, and YouTube, shouldn’t voters make their choices based on something other than campaign stops?

It is not as if voters lack chances to see Thompson for themselves. He has appeared on Sean Hannity’s radio and TV programs many times, and is a frequent guest on Laura Ingraham’s and Mark Levin’s shows as well. If you are truly obsessed with getting to know the candidates, C-SPAN displays hours of campaign footage. A limited number of live appearances is no reason to vote against him.

Even so, it would be at least understandable if Thompson was losing to Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani, who, despite the fact that they are not conservatives, are at least qualified to be President. Mitt Romney’s years of valuable business experience make him a desirable candidate, and whether one likes or dislikes Rudy Giuliani (I am in the “dislike” camp), it is impossible to deny that he did a truly amazing job both before and after 9/11. Both of these candidates are comparable to Thompson, and voters could be excused for supporting them over Fred.

But Mike Huckabee and John McCain? The fact that these individuals are the current Republican frontrunners should dispel any notions that Republicans are smarter than Democrats.

Republicans were outraged over the infamous amnesty bill this summer. The bill’s biggest proponent was John McCain, who accused those who disagreed with him of anti-Hispanic bigotry. Republicans claim to be against extensive government effort to combat global warming. John McCain isn’t. He voted against the Bush tax cuts, and supported the now more-or-less discredited embryonic stem cell research. And he is one of the Republican frontrunners?

The bad news is that he is the better frontrunner. I’m not sure how qualified Mike Huckabee was to be a governor, much less a President. He seems to make policies out of thin air, and frequently appears unaware of the world around him. For example, he seemed to think that he was going on David Letterman’s show instead of Jay Leno’s on the eve of the Iowa caucuses, and was unaware of the NIE report over 24 hours after it was released. The first isn’t very important (though it is revealing), but the second… His record as Arkansas governor wasn’t as bad as some believe—but it wasn’t very good either.

But Huckabee is a frontrunner in this race, based solely on his charisma. Granted, Huckabee is a convincing guy—I’m pretty sure that if he had not gone for politics or religion, he would be a traveling salesman going from town to town selling little pills you drop in your gas tank to give your car 100 mpg gas mileage. Voters know his weaknesses on the issues, as National Review, Rush Limbaugh, and Laura Ingraham, among many others, have been highly critical of him. But the Huckster comes in, does his aw-shucks Jim Nabors impression, and Shazam!--he is a GOP frontrunner.

It doesn’t say much about the intelligence of Republican primary voters that they unerringly seek out the two worst candidates for their support.


At January 10, 2008 at 3:39 AM , Blogger Beth said...

Amen, Daniel!

How can we smack our fellow conservative Republicans in the head and get this message through to them????

Do people want style over substance? It appears so.

At January 10, 2008 at 6:43 AM , Blogger WomanHonorThyself said...

hiya Daniel..youre so right on this one..a tragedy in the making!..sigh

At January 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM , Blogger Name: Soapboxgod said...

I don't know who's handing out these blog awards but clearly they've overlooked a very well written one (save a spelling error: basely solely) LOL.

If one needs any other barometer for Conservatism, consider just how liberal a state New Hampshire is and then take a look at the GOP primary results. Thompson and Hunter (unquestionably the two most Conservative candidates in the race) barely registered.

Thompson 2,886 1%
Hunter 1,220 0%

At January 10, 2008 at 12:50 PM , Blogger Name: Soapboxgod said...

"But he is a poor campaigner.."

Daniel, is this your opinion and if so, what leads you to this conclusion?

While that is the argument made, in addition to him seeming "lazy", "uninspired", "lackadaisical", etc., there's an inability to find any meeningful criticism save for McCain-Feingold.

I've been following his daily activity via his Fred'08 website and it seems to me he's stumpin' pretty hard.

At January 10, 2008 at 7:54 PM , Blogger Obob said...

My computer is getting weird, so let me throw this quick, Fred needs to get his act together. He is the best man for the job who will slip by if he doesn't do well in South Carolina. He flat out tells it like it is.

At January 10, 2008 at 7:59 PM , Blogger MTHorvat said...

At the turn of the century the Popes warned that voting based on personality, sentimentality and feelings would begin to dominate if the vote were given to women. Now, in our age of feminized men as well, what can we expect? When Hilary tears up, and the ladies are moved from sympathy or empathy or whatever to vote for her, then we have to face the fact that issues are secondary things in modern politics to a large part of the voting public.

At November 5, 2014 at 4:48 PM , Blogger oakleyses said...

louis vuitton outlet, coach purses, prada outlet, tiffany and co jewelry, nike shoes, red bottom shoes, longchamp handbags, oakley sunglasses, longchamp outlet, christian louboutin outlet, oakley vault, kate spade handbags, louis vuitton handbags, true religion outlet, louis vuitton outlet online, coach outlet, ray ban outlet, nike air max, burberry outlet online, polo ralph lauren outlet, kate spade outlet online, polo ralph lauren, coach outlet store online, nike air max, tiffany jewelry, cheap oakley sunglasses, coach outlet, true religion, christian louboutin, longchamp outlet online, burberry outlet online, michael kors outlet online, michael kors outlet store, michael kors outlet online, tory burch outlet, michael kors outlet, chanel handbags, gucci handbags, michael kors outlet online, nike free, louis vuitton outlet, michael kors outlet online, ray ban sunglasses, christian louboutin shoes, louis vuitton, jordan shoes, prada handbags

At November 5, 2014 at 4:50 PM , Blogger oakleyses said...

nike blazer pas cher, lacoste pas cher, timberland, north face, air max, guess pas cher, nike free, air jordan, sac louis vuitton, air max pas cher, hollister, michael kors canada, lululemon, barbour, abercrombie and fitch, burberry pas cher, hermes pas cher, vans pas cher, north face pas cher, nike air max, sac vanessa bruno, chaussure louboutin, mulberry, nike roshe run, ralph lauren pas cher, louis vuitton, louis vuitton pas cher, sac michael kors, converse pas cher, nike free pas cher, oakley pas cher, ralph lauren, longchamp, new balance pas cher, hollister, nike roshe, louis vuitton uk, tn pas cher, scarpe hogan, true religion jeans, nike air force, longchamp pas cher, michael kors uk, ray ban pas cher, ray ban uk, true religion outlet, nike air max

At November 5, 2014 at 4:54 PM , Blogger oakleyses said...

marc jacobs outlet, beats headphones, canada goose, rolex watches, abercrombie and fitch, celine handbags, new balance outlet, instyler ionic styler, ugg boots, reebok shoes, roshe run, uggs on sale, ghd, north face jackets, nike huarache, valentino shoes, vans outlet, ugg outlet, p90x workout, ugg soldes, mont blanc pens, chi flat iron, canada goose outlet, lululemon outlet, ferragamo shoes, longchamp, nfl jerseys, asics shoes, mac cosmetics, bottega veneta, north face outlet, herve leger, birkin bag, wedding dresses, insanity workout, soccer shoes, soccer jerseys, giuseppe zanotti, nike trainers, canada goose outlet, babyliss pro, canada goose outlet, hollister, jimmy choo shoes, uggs outlet, ugg, mcm handbags

At November 5, 2014 at 4:59 PM , Blogger oakleyses said...

moncler, moncler outlet, hollister, juicy couture outlet, ralph lauren, moncler, louis vuitton canada, montre femme, moncler, canada goose pas cher, pandora uk, parajumpers outlet, thomas sabo uk, iphone 6 case, ray ban, lancel, oakley, swarovski jewelry, supra shoes, moncler, louboutin, uggs canada, coach outlet, swarovski uk, wedding dress, ugg, canada goose, baseball bats, canada goose, timberland shoes, replica watches, pandora jewelry, gucci, moncler, converse shoes, air max, karen millen, hollister clothing, juicy couture outlet, pandora charms, hollister canada, vans, converse, links of london uk, nike air max, moncler, toms outlet, canada goose uk


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home